You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on [LINK] Larry = Harry sans magic? Google vs. Death - Less Wrong Discussion

23 Post author: shminux 18 September 2013 04:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Lumifer 18 September 2013 08:40:58PM 0 points [-]

There is a serious lack of details. Essentially all that's been said is that Google will throw money at the problem. Well... I don't have high expectations that this will be a game-changer.

Comment author: RobbBB 19 September 2013 06:07:39AM 14 points [-]

This is a good sign not because money-throwing is sufficient, but because it's necessary.

Comment author: kurokikaze 19 September 2013 11:44:18AM 4 points [-]

Google have processing power backed by trained engineers, which might be important too. Google can do things like "Folding@home" on their own.

Comment author: MugaSofer 20 September 2013 06:58:59AM 4 points [-]

Anti-aging researchers talk a lot about how they could do so much more with proper funding. I mean, they would say that, but that doesn't mean it isn't true - after all, the odds that the optimal amount of funding was that small is ... small.

Also, Google bring credibility and, perhaps, greater competence/strategy at approaching moonshots.