You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

knb comments on [LINK] Larry = Harry sans magic? Google vs. Death - Less Wrong Discussion

23 Post author: shminux 18 September 2013 04:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: knb 20 September 2013 03:30:02AM 2 points [-]

Huh?

I think you're in a terminology muddle. Locaha clearly means "aging" as senescence, not just the passage of time. "Aging" and "senescence" are often used interchangeably, which leads to confusion.

Comment author: Risto_Saarelma 20 September 2013 05:26:33AM *  2 points [-]

Locaha's comment still doesn't really make sense. Senescence is a specific mechanism that makes you more susceptible to cancer and heart disease, among other things. Curing cancer and heart disease won't cure senescence, though curing cancer probably would help. Curing senescence should cause a clear decrease in cancer and heart disease when you improve the ability of human bodies to repair themselves.

Comment author: knb 20 September 2013 06:22:18AM *  3 points [-]

To cure cancer and heart disease (as opposed to postponing death caused by cancer and heart disease) you would have to stop senescence. As long as senescence continues, heart disease and cancer will occur.

When viewed in this light, you can see that Locaha's comment makes perfect sense.