I couldn't figure out the tone of this post.
Is he trying to poke fun at it? Pointing out there's a more general version? What?
He's saying it's alright but nothing special. He's saying it's over-hyped because it has a snappy name. If only he'd called BQP the Unitarihedron!
I recently ran across a rather interesting result while browsing the Internet:
Physics Discover Geometry Underlying Particle Physics
Unfortunately, I'm still at the point in my education where my best response to new physics is "cache for later," and the fact that it claims to eliminate locality/unitarity seems decidedly odd to my mostly-untrained mind. I notice I am confused, and that LessWrong has a rather large number of trained physicists.