You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open Thread, September 23-29, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Mestroyer 24 September 2013 01:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (261)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: niceguyanon 25 September 2013 04:44:32AM *  2 points [-]

Do I have a bias or useful heuristic? If a signal is easy to fake, is it a bias to assume that it is disingenuous or is it an useful heuristic?

I read Robert Hanson's post about why there are so many charities specifically focusing on kids and he basically summed it up as signalling to seem kind, for potential mates, being a major factor. There were some good rebuttals in the comment sections but whether or not signalling is at play is not the point, I'm sure to a certain degree it is, how much? I don't know. The point is that I automatically dismiss the authenticity of a signal if the signal is difficult to authenticate. In this example it is possible for people to both, signal that they care about children for a potential mate, as well as actually really caring about children ( e.g. innate emotional response).

EDIT: Just to be clear, this is a question about signalling and how I strongly associate easy to fake signals with dishonest signalling, not about charities.

Comment author: ChristianKl 25 September 2013 12:23:27PM 2 points [-]

Do I have a bias or useful heuristic?

That's like asking whether someone is a freedom fighter or a terrorist.

Every heuristic involves a bias when you use it in some contexts.

Comment author: niceguyanon 25 September 2013 01:36:03PM 1 point [-]

Every heuristic involves a bias when you use it in some contexts.

Yes, but does it more often yield a satisfactory solution across many contexts if yes, then I'd label it a useful heuristic and if it is often wrong I would label it a bias.

Comment author: notsonewuser 02 October 2013 08:51:22PM 1 point [-]

You're not using your words as effectively as you could be. Heuristics are mental shortcuts, bias is a systematic deviation from rationality. A heuristic can't be a bias, and a bias can't be a heuristic. Heuristics can lead to bias. The utility of a certain heuristic might be evaluated based on an evaluation of how much computation using the heuristic saves versus how much bias using the heuristic will incur. Using a bad heuristic might cause an individual to become biased, but the heuristic itself is not a bias.