You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

drethelin comments on Open Thread, October 7 - October 12, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Thomas 07 October 2013 02:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (312)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: drethelin 12 October 2013 05:26:26AM 0 points [-]

There's nothing wrong with selfish intent. Most of my intents are selfish.

Comment author: hyporational 12 October 2013 05:34:23AM *  1 point [-]

I see I had a more constrained idea of selfishness in mind than you did. I'm not interested in arguing semantics (or maybe I am?). Removed the part about selfishness. It wasn't the point anyways.

ETA: Here's what I think is selfish: pushing your goals without concern for others. Perhaps you assumed a more general interpretation where looking for pleasure and avoiding pain is selfish. In that case, you've made the word useless, because it applies to everyone.

Comment author: drethelin 12 October 2013 05:59:50PM 0 points [-]

your definition of selfishness does not seem to apply here, as he seems to want to help everyone else in his own situation.

Comment author: hyporational 12 October 2013 09:06:19PM *  0 points [-]

So he says. He belongs to the group he's trying to help. He seems to have no concern for LWers. Was I correct about your definition?

Comment author: drethelin 12 October 2013 10:37:35PM 0 points [-]

Pretty much. I think the use of the word selfish as a pejorative is usually bad.

Comment author: hyporational 12 October 2013 10:56:57PM 0 points [-]

I used to think so too.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 13 October 2013 12:01:06AM 0 points [-]

What changed your mind?

And, relatedly, is there a difference between pushing my goals without concern for others, and pushing my goals in situations where I expect others to be harmed by my doing so?

Comment author: hyporational 13 October 2013 12:20:41AM *  1 point [-]

I don't think the word selfish ever has had a positive connotation, and rarely a neutral one. I used to argue about word definitions, but then I realized it's less frustrating to use words the way people usually do. I think self-interest is a similar word usually used in a more neutral manner.

I think a good rule of thumb is to assume people don't mean to use words in ways that describe everything or nothing in the reference class i.e. "everyone is selfish and nobody is an altruist", "no love is unconditional". Don't think people are as stupid as their language is.

pushing my goals in situations where I expect others to be harmed by my doing so?

I think people use stronger words for this, but selfish is used too. Evil comes to mind.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 13 October 2013 02:18:41AM 0 points [-]

a good rule of thumb is to assume people don't mean to use words in ways that describe everything or nothing in the reference class

Agreed.

people use stronger words for [pushing my goals in situations where I expect others to be harmed by my doing so]. Evil comes to mind.

Do you mean to imply that you consider this evil, in addition to being selfish? Or do you just mean to make a statement about how people use words?

Comment author: hyporational 13 October 2013 07:41:38AM 0 points [-]

Both. Depends on the extent of harm, obviously. I also don't mean to imply it's the only way people use the word evil. I steelmanned your question a bit. I assume you mean net harm, not minor collateral damage.

The norms here are probably a bit different, and adapting to the local language is desirable.

Comment author: wedrifid 13 October 2013 11:13:55AM -1 points [-]

There's nothing wrong with selfish intent.

Except, of course, if they go against my inclusive interests in any way that my social influence can hope to impact. In that case it is Wrong, Other-Tribalish, sinister, naive, uncouth, dirty and generally low status.