You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam_Bur comments on Open Thread, October 7 - October 12, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Thomas 07 October 2013 02:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (312)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 12 October 2013 10:55:56PM *  1 point [-]

there are some mainstream-controversial topics that get discussed in that way here, with that sort of social norm, and I expect that in some communities the opinion of LW is tainted by those discussions in the same way you discuss

One difference is a different degree of taboo. Another one, I suspect more important, was the timing. The controversial topics didn't start by someone posting a full article out of the blue. They first appeared as comments in other articles, somewhat related to their topics. Only later someone would write an article about it. And at least I didn't have an impression that someone is on LW only to talk about the taboo topics.

In other words, if you want to talk about controversial topics, don't start by shocking everyone. (Unless it's a "door in the face" technique, when the shocking article gets heavily downvoted, but then people feel kinda guilty and become more tolerant in the discussion.)

Comment author: TheOtherDave 12 October 2013 10:59:45PM 0 points [-]

One difference is a different degree of taboo. Another one, I suspect more important, was the timing.

Yes, those are two differences, agreed. My suspicion is that the importance ranks the other way, but you might be right.

, if you want to talk about controversial topics, don't start by shocking everyone. (Unless it's a "door in the face" technique

Agreed, including the caveat and a few other caveats in the same vein.