= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
buybuydandavis comments on On the importance of taking limits: Infinite Spheres of Utility - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (58)
Very nice work.
I feel it accomplishes too much for most people, though, so that they might not get everything out of it.
Great as a demonstration of Jaynes' point about paradoxes generate by failure to identify the limiting process for proposed infinities. But also great as a demonstration of how "doing the math" can resolve a lot of these philosophical debates which just don't specify problem conditions sufficiently because they don't explicitly write them down in mathematical form.
I think a lot of the self referential problems many like around here (Omega stuff, as an example) would be similarly dissolved by the latter.
I agree that it's a lot to cover, but I wanted to work a full example. We talk a lot on LW about decision analysis and paradoxes in the abstract, but I'm coming from a math/physics background, and it's much more helpful for me to see concrete examples. I assume some other people feel the same way.
Self-referential problems would be an interesting area to study, but I'm not familiar with the techniques. I suspect you're right, though.