Research interests I don't currently have time to develop alone

Stuart_Armstrong

EDIT: added the "rights of parents" and "simulation hypothesis" research interests.

I've started a lot of research projects and have a lot of research interests that I don't currently have time to develop on my own. So I'm putting the research interests together on this page, and anyone can let me know if they're interested in doing any joint projects on these topics. This can range from coauthoring, to simply having a conversation about these and seeing where that goes.

The possible research topics are:

Reduced impact AI (this is one I'm certainly going to be returning to, once I have the time).
The Fermi paradox and universal colonisation.
Anthropic decision theory (extending it to include quantum mechanics).
How to divide the gains from trade/to negotiate/to achieve "fairness"/to avoid blackmail.
Oracle AI and the (non-)differences between tool AIs and agents
General assessments of predictions and experts (including counterfactual resiliency).
The future of surveillance.
The risks of singleton world governments and mass-em worlds.
Anthropic shadows for multiple risks.
The potential limitations of the Turing test as an accurate general intelligence test.
Extending the orthogonality thesis to realistic AI designs.
Infinite ethics.
The cake or death problem for value loading: whether it's fully solved or whether similar problems remain.
The problems with total utilitarianism.
The problems with CEV (and potential solutions).
Whether AIXI would end protecting itself or not.
The rights of parents versus others in determining the genetic modifications of their children (and the efficiency of the markets in these kinds of modifications).
Exploring the consequences of the simulation hypothesis, as Joshua Fox did.

EDIT: added the "rights of parents" and "simulation hypothesis" research interests.

The possible research topics are:

Reduced impact AI (this is one I'm certainly going to be returning to, once I have the time).
The Fermi paradox and universal colonisation.
Anthropic decision theory (extending it to include quantum mechanics).
How to divide the gains from trade/to negotiate/to achieve "fairness"/to avoid blackmail.
Oracle AI and the (non-)differences between tool AIs and agents
General assessments of predictions and experts (including counterfactual resiliency).
The future of surveillance.
The risks of singleton world governments and mass-em worlds.
Anthropic shadows for multiple risks.
The potential limitations of the Turing test as an accurate general intelligence test.
Extending the orthogonality thesis to realistic AI designs.
Infinite ethics.
The cake or death problem for value loading: whether it's fully solved or whether similar problems remain.
The problems with total utilitarianism.
The problems with CEV (and potential solutions).
Whether AIXI would end protecting itself or not.
The rights of parents versus others in determining the genetic modifications of their children (and the efficiency of the markets in these kinds of modifications).
Exploring the consequences of the simulation hypothesis, as Joshua Fox did.

Those powers being to use the military inside his own borders, being allowed to kill citizens of his own country without judicial oversight and waging wars by his own decision.

And these powers derive from the 9/11 trauma, not from mass surveillance. And we've seen far worse in the US in the last 60 years.

I certainly agree that surveillance enables bad governments, but I've yet to see a good argument that surveillance causes good governments to go bad (eg UK vs France).

The director of intelligence can keep his job despite the criminal act of lying under oath to congress. In what we call in Europe a democratic state something like that doesn't happen.

Alas, that does happen, and has happened, regularly over the last years, decades, and centuries.

27

Research interests I don't currently have time to develop alone

27

27

27

Research interests I don't currently have time to develop alone

27

27