You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Creating an Optimal Future - Less Wrong Discussion

-2 [deleted] 18 October 2013 01:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 19 October 2013 09:43:44PM 0 points [-]

Number of karma votes? Possibly. But then you'd need votes and I'm not sure that is a reliable method.

You don't need to pay out once or at a fixed time. Normal stocks aren't either.

My first idea was that you could 'buy' a meme and advertize so e.g. on your blog. This creates a 'demand' for certain memes. The problem is that you'd be incentiviced to sell your own opinion to cash in.

Then I came up with the idea of 'endorsing' versus 'trading' memes. Endorsing a meme could be taken to be a dividend of the meme. This allows to 'buy' early and cash in on the later endorsing by others. And you could still sell when you have convinced the majority without dropping your endoring. If everybody is only entitled to a limited number of 'endorsed' memes this avoids meme inflation.

The idea is that endorsing is a slow proces you may change your opinion only once a week, e.g. by linkingto it (or its reverse on your blog. But trading can be as fast as you want.