You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

[Link] You and Your Research

16 Post author: katydee 20 October 2013 12:05AM

I've seen Richard Hamming's classic talk You And Your Research referenced several times on LessWrong and figured I would post the full version. The introduction is reproduced below:

The title of my talk is, ``You and Your Research.'' It is not about managing research, it is about how you individually do your research. I could give a talk on the other subject - but it's not, it's about you. I'm not talking about ordinary run-of-the-mill research; I'm talking about great research. And for the sake of describing great research I'll occasionally say Nobel-Prize type of work. It doesn't have to gain the Nobel Prize, but I mean those kinds of things which we perceive are significant things. Relativity, if you want, Shannon's information theory, any number of outstanding theories - that's the kind of thing I'm talking about.

Now, how did I come to do this study? At Los Alamos I was brought in to run the computing machines which other people had got going, so those scientists and physicists could get back to business. I saw I was a stooge. I saw that although physically I was the same, they were different. And to put the thing bluntly, I was envious. I wanted to know why they were so different from me. I saw Feynman up close. I saw Fermi and Teller. I saw Oppenheimer. I saw Hans Bethe: he was my boss. I saw quite a few very capable people. I became very interested in the difference between those who do and those who might have done.

When I came to Bell Labs, I came into a very productive department. Bode was the department head at the time; Shannon was there, and there were other people. I continued examining the questions, ``Why?'' and ``What is the difference?'' I continued subsequently by reading biographies, autobiographies, asking people questions such as: ``How did you come to do this?'' I tried to find out what are the differences. And that's what this talk is about.

I consider this talk good and useful not only for those interested in research, but for those interested in achieving much of anything. Check it out!

Comments (1)

Comment author: [deleted] 20 October 2013 01:53:20AM *  9 points [-]

A version of this talk is presented as the final chapter of The Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (pdf), which I recommend in almost its entirety. The book is a write-up of a graduate course in engineering that he taught. As he puts it:

There is really no technical content in the course, though I will, of course, refer to a great deal of it, and hopefully it will generally be a good review of the fundamentals of what you have learned. Do not think it is the content of the course—it is only illustrative material. Style of thinking is the center of the course.

It's similarly full of anecdotes about discoveries and advice about doing research, but is able to draw on more technical examples, to (I think) its great advantage.