You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Is it immoral to have children? - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: jkaufman 22 October 2013 12:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (317)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 24 October 2013 06:57:53PM 1 point [-]

a much stronger argument for sperm/egg donation than having kids?

Within this context, isn't donating sperm/eggs the same thing as having kids except that someone else will have to bring them up and bear the costs?

Comment author: jkaufman 24 October 2013 08:40:09PM 0 points [-]

Not really. If I donate my genetic material it doesn't decrease the amount of money I have available to donate and only very slightly decreases my time.

If there were lots of people who wanted to have kids but couldn't because of an egg/sperm shortage, and a significant number were likely to donate lots to charity only if they didn't have kids, then it would be wrong to donate genetic material. We're nowhere near that situation on either count, though.