You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on Less Wrong’s political bias - Less Wrong Discussion

-6 Post author: Sophronius 25 October 2013 04:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (352)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 26 October 2013 11:00:52PM 2 points [-]

I would caution against inferring any of that with significant confidence solely from personal experiences.

I'm sure my generalizations would be wrong for lots of individual Progressives and Libertarians, but that won't make me dismiss my conclusions from my lifetime of observations. What can we reason, but from what we know?

I would also caution against describing the situation the way you do here unless your intention is to upset progressives who lack X.

I'm a libertarian, loathe Progressive doctrines, and would remake the world to efface their effects from existence. If they're Progressives and lack X, I don't see a way to sugar coat those facts that will make them happy. Do you?

That said, upsetting people in this way can of course be a very effective way of maneuvering for status

Yes, and framing someone's statements as intentionally upsetting people to maneuver for status is effective in maneuvering for status with some people too.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 26 October 2013 11:23:18PM 0 points [-]

What can we reason, but from what we know?

We can't. But we can do things that increase the reliability of what we know.

I don't see a way to sugar coat those facts that will make them happy. Do you?

Nope.

framing someone's statements as intentionally upsetting people to maneuver for status is effective in maneuvering for status with some people too

Absolutely.