You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TheAncientGeek comments on Why didn't people (apparently?) understand the metaethics sequence? - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: ChrisHallquist 29 October 2013 11:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (229)

Comments (229)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 05 November 2013 09:39:29AM 1 point [-]

That is not proof that the question is empty, of course. All it demonstrates is that one of your arguments in defense of its non-emptiness is flawed.

Non-emptiness is no more flawed than emptiness. The Open Question remains open.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 05 November 2013 02:23:06PM 0 points [-]

This is a nonsequitor. My claim was about a specific argument.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit