So, the question becomes, how do you recognize "rationalist" stories in non-fan-fic form? Is it simply the presence of show-your-work-smart characters? Is simply behaving rationally sufficient?
That's a great question. (And related to how to recognize rational people in real life.)
I'd say that there must be some characters which are obviously smarter than most people around them. Because that's what happens in real life: there is the bell curve, so if all your characters are on a similar level, then the story is (a) not realistic, (b) the characters are selected by some intelligence filter which should be explicitly mentioned, or (c) the characters are all from the middle of the bell curve. Also, in real life the relative power of intelligent people is often reduced by compartmentalization, but this reduction would be much smaller for a rationalist hero.
So I'd say it's behaving rationally while most of other people aren't. The character should somehow reflect on the stupidity of others; whether by frustration from their inability to cooperate, or by enjoyment of how easily they are manipulated.
The character should somehow reflect on the stupidity of others; whether by frustration from their inability to cooperate, or by enjoyment of how easily they are manipulated.
I'm not sure I like that criteria. By that criteria alone, the original death note anime was rationalist fiction (judging by the first half), as is Artemis Fowl, Ender's Game, and to some extent even Game of Thrones. There are a lot of stories where some characters are much smarter than others and know it, but consuming these works won't teach anyone how to be smarter. (Other than t...
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.