Why does this forum spend so much time and effort discussing untestables and unprovables? I'ts disappointing.
Generally, there are many things which are unproven or not tested, a smaller (but still large) number of things which difficult to test or difficult to prove, a smaller number of things which are testable or provable relatively easily, and finally a small number of things which are tested or proven.
One can expect some people to consider only truths which cluster at these ends. Academia I think tends in that direction. At one level this makes sense, one can expect a lot of useful work to be done on things which are relatively easy to prove, while things...
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.