So one would expect the more interesting truths still open to question to be concentrated along the spectrum of harder or very hard to prove.
Indeed. But reframing and carving testables from untestables and provables from unprovables should be an explicit goal.
Indeed. But reframing and carving testables from untestables and provables from unprovables should be an explicit goal.
OK. And so should a theoretical exploration of the space of hypotheses about the not-yet provables with the intent of getting the most truth for the buck when these expensive experiments are finally done.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.