You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vulture comments on Open Thread, November 1 - 7, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: witzvo 02 November 2013 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (299)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vulture 10 November 2013 02:52:10AM *  0 points [-]

I think the really relevant ethical question is whether a tulpa has a separate consciousness from its host. From my own researches in the area (which have been very casual, mind you), I consider it highly unlikely that they have separate consciousness, but not so unlikely that I would be willing to create a tulpa and then let it die, for example.

In fact, my uncertainty on this issue is the main reason I am ambivalent about creating a tulpa. It seems like it would be very useful: I solve problems much better when working with other people, even if they don't contribute much; a tulpa more virtuous than myself could be a potent tool for self-improvement; it could help ameliorate the "fear of social isolation" obstacle to potential ambitious projects; I would gain a better understanding of how tulpas work; I could practice dancing and shaking hands more often; etc. etc. But I worry about being responsible for what may be (even with only ~15% subjective probability) a conscious mind, which will then literally die if I don't spend time with it regularly (ref).

Comment author: TheOtherDave 10 November 2013 04:10:40AM 0 points [-]

Just to clarify this a little... how many separate consciousnesses do you estimate your brain currently hosts?

Comment author: Vulture 10 November 2013 05:11:21AM 0 points [-]

By my current (layman's) understanding of consciousness, my brain currently hosts exactly one.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 10 November 2013 02:00:24PM 0 points [-]

OK, thanks.