You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

joaolkf comments on The Inefficiency of Theoretical Discovery - Less Wrong Discussion

19 Post author: lukeprog 03 November 2013 09:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (109)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: joaolkf 04 November 2013 05:55:57PM 0 points [-]

A book about Einstein and Godel claims both of them were able to identify a problem that became suddenly relevant and trackable due to other developments. I think there are certain 'game changers' that reshape discovery space producing low-hanging fruits. But, I do not think these low hanging fruits stay there for long. The possibility of AGI and X-Risks made some of your examples relevant, and they were addressed shortly after those game changers arose. But otherwise, some of your points seem similar to those on the Einstein-Godel book I read.

Comment author: lukeprog 04 November 2013 07:06:17PM 0 points [-]

Which book?

Comment author: joaolkf 04 November 2013 07:10:58PM 0 points [-]

http://www.ams.org/notices/200707/tx070700861p.pdf

It is more of a biography of their friendship. I don't think is worth reading. I almost summarized all his conclusions of the matter, except he applies it in more detail to history of science.