You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

blacktrance comments on 2013 Census/Survey: call for changes and additions - Less Wrong Discussion

27 Post author: Yvain 05 November 2013 03:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (154)

Comments (154)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: blacktrance 06 November 2013 08:00:38PM 2 points [-]

I thought the same too, but I couldn't think of any decent wording for “open to more relationship partners (but not looking actively)”.

Perhaps the three options should be something like "Actively looking for new relationship partners", "Open to new relationship partners, but not actively looking" and "Not open to new relationship partners".

Do rule consequentialists simultaneously count both as consequentialists and deontologists?

Probably not, Consequentialism is fundamentally concerned with consequences (hence the name), which makes it and deontology mutually exclusive.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 November 2013 10:32:04AM 1 point [-]

Perhaps the three options should be something like "Actively looking for new relationship partners", "Open to new relationship partners, but not actively looking" and "Not open to new relationship partners".

Excellent.

Probably not, Consequentialism is fundamentally concerned with consequences (hence the name), which makes it and deontology mutually exclusive.

So consequentialism be it (as I voted in the last two surveys).

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit