You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CalmCanary comments on Weak repugnant conclusion need not be so repugnant given fixed resources - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 17 November 2013 03:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CalmCanary 17 November 2013 06:23:17PM 0 points [-]

Are you saying we should maximize the average utility of all humans, or of all sentient beings? The first one is incredibly parochial, but the second one implies that how many children we should have depends on the happiness of aliens on the other side of the universe, which is, at the very least, pretty weird.

Not having an ethical mandate to create new life might or might not be a good idea, but average utilitarianism doesn't get you there. It just changes the criteria in bizarre ways.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 18 November 2013 10:34:35AM 0 points [-]

Are you saying we should maximize the average utility of all humans, or of all sentient beings?

I'm not saying anything, at this point. I believe that the best population ethics is likely to be complicated, just as standard ethics are, and I haven't fully settled on either yet.