You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gwern comments on To like, or not to like? - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: PhilGoetz 14 November 2013 02:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 17 November 2013 03:46:55AM 1 point [-]

Are there any measurable world records from the Elizabethan era that still stand?

I'm not sure what sort of world record you would have in mind, and given the parlous state of science at the time, what world records would you trust? If, for example, I exhibited a Chinaman from the Ming who lived for 231 years, which is surely a world record, you would rightly reject this by saying 'it is much more likely that this world record is inaccurate than he really did live to 231, given how notoriously bad records were at the time, the cultural value set on being the oldest man in the world, etc'.

If Shakespeare got pretty close to the perfect tragedy, but there was a slight refinement of the form from the 19th century that's better (if less significant), surely people would prefer to watch that, and count themselves fans of that author.

If Shakespeare helped define what the perfect tragedy was, and all later tragedies felt the 'anxiety of influence', this isn't so clearcut. See my other comment.