You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Feedback from Less Wrong Community

5 Post author: scott_from_castify 18 November 2013 06:06AM

Hi from Castify.

We're continuing our work to turn the Less Wrong sequences into audio. Could you spare about 30 seconds to help us decide which one to do next

Comments (6)

Comment author: scott_from_castify 25 November 2013 01:36:59AM 3 points [-]

Thanks everyone. How to Actually Change Your Mind up next.

Comment author: pinyaka 18 November 2013 08:26:15PM 2 points [-]

Instead of Yes/No on the "will you buy it" question, you might add options like "maybe >50%" and "maybe <50%." There's a definite chance that I will buy the one that I'm voting for, but it's less than 50% so I'm just going to answer "no."

Comment author: scott_from_castify 19 November 2013 01:29:27AM 1 point [-]

I suppose what we'd really like to know is the expected value of of each sequence so we can do the one with the highest expected revenue. We could have asked you to put probabilities of purchasing each sequence next to the name of the sequence. Maybe next time…

Comment author: somervta 20 November 2013 05:35:53AM 0 points [-]

I'm so tempted to say quantum just to see how you do it!

But no. Responded, seriously.

Comment author: scott_from_castify 20 November 2013 07:52:33AM *  0 points [-]

What we'd probably do is, for most articles, just tell you it's best to read the article here. We've done that quite a few times before and try to let people know we do this when describing the product.

Comment author: falenas108 18 November 2013 10:42:45PM -1 points [-]

I don't think you can physically do the quantum sequence, because so much of it is diagrams.