Open Thread, November 23-30, 2013

passive_fist

8 Open Thread, November 23-30, 2013

by passive_fist

23rd Nov 2013

1 min read

301

8

If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

Personal Blog

8

New Comment

Rendering 0/301 comments, sorted by

top scoring

(show more) Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 8:16 PM

Some comments are truncated due to high volume. (⌘F to expand all)Change truncation settings

Moderation Log

8 Open Thread, November 23-30, 2013

by passive_fist

23rd Nov 2013

1 min read

301

8

If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

Personal Blog

8

New Comment

Rendering 0/301 comments, sorted by

top scoring

(show more) Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 8:16 PM

Some comments are truncated due to high volume. (⌘F to expand all)Change truncation settings

Moderation Log

More from passive_fist

Curated and popular this week

301Comments

301

Comment Permalink

Jayson_Virissimo13y160

If you accept the criticism it makes of democracy you are already basically Neoreactionary

And if we accept the Reactionary criticisms of democracy and the Progressive criticisms of aristocracy and monarchy? What then?

Showing 3 of 5 replies (Click to show all)

FiftyTwo13y00

You make incremental patches and innovations in the existing setup, and keep a very close eye on the results.

4[anonymous]13y

I want to emphasize again monarchy only recently gained popularity among neoreactionaries, its possible the majority of them still dream of Moldbug's SovCorps. Anarcho-Papist for example basically believes anarcho-capitalism is best but thinks the Neoreactionary analysis of why society is so leftist is correct.

8[anonymous]13y

Then you either throw up your hands and go meta with secession/seasteading/etc. or try to find existing systems that neither of those systems would apply to... how about Switzerland?

See in context