You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gjm comments on Open Thread, November 23-30, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: passive_fist 23 November 2013 06:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (295)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: gjm 28 November 2013 05:15:26PM 5 points [-]

Marcus Hutter just had a little article about AIXI published on the Australian website "The Conversation". Not much there that will be new to LW readers, though. Includes a link to his presentation at the 2012 Singularity Summit.

Discussion on Hacker News. (As happens far too often on HN, the link there is to the blogspam site phys.org rather than to the original source.)

Comment author: JoshuaZ 28 November 2013 08:52:38PM -1 points [-]

As happens far too often on HN, the link there is to the blogspam site phys.org rather than to the original source.)

This is not a problem at all unique to HN.

Comment author: 9eB1 02 December 2013 09:10:10AM 2 points [-]

It's actually somewhat less of a problem on Hacker News than many sites, because the editors there will proactively change the source to the more canonical. For example, this particular post now points to the original article.

Comment author: gjm 28 November 2013 09:45:53PM 2 points [-]

No indeed. But it's a problem that HN has, which is why I remarked on it. (I don't see it, for instance, here at Less Wrong.)

Comment author: Emile 29 November 2013 12:57:26PM 6 points [-]

I don't see it, for instance, here at Less Wrong.

I do sometimes get mildly annoyed at people linking to a generic news site about some research (nytimes, etc.) instead of digging up a source as close to the original as possible.

It may not be "blogspam" proper, but it's research or tech being summarized by journalists, which tends to be less accurate than the original source.