You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

hyporational comments on Open Thread, November 23-30, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: passive_fist 23 November 2013 06:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (295)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: hyporational 30 November 2013 07:43:18AM *  1 point [-]

But that's not a dozen drugs

That's true, I missed the sentence about a dozen drugs. Keep in mind though she might not take all of them exclusively for that particular condition.

I can think of a half-dozen neurochemicals she might be pioneering

I would be interested if you named a few, and whether there's any evidence of their usefulness.

I can think of a half-dozen neurochemicals she might be pioneering.

If that's the case the question becomes should she really be allowed to do that. I have no problem with that if the system allows for the patient being completely responsible for taking those drugs, but I don't think any doctor or insurance company should be expected to take the fall for her. If the drug isn't well documented and she doesn't take part in a trial, I think she should finance treatment for any complications herself, and that could easily get more expensive than she can afford.