You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on How do you tell proto-science from pseudo-science? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: DataPacRat 27 November 2013 07:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (88)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: shminux 27 November 2013 09:49:15PM *  4 points [-]

The difference between a pseudoscience and a far-fetched hypothesis is the attitude toward the scientific method. Wikipedia:

Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status.[1] Pseudoscience is often characterized by the use of vague, contradictory, exaggerated or unprovable claims, an over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation, a lack of openness to evaluation by other experts, and a general absence of systematic processes to rationally develop theories.

In other words, using the popular map/territory meme, pseudoscience has no interest in making an accurate map, only a good-looking flashy one.