You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

knb comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 28, chapter 99-101 - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: palladias 12 December 2013 05:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (365)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: knb 12 December 2013 08:26:24PM 2 points [-]

I assume the centaur tried to kill Harry because he prophesied that "the skies will soon be empty" because of Harry. Based on what we know about Harry, the skies could be "emptied" because of Dyson spheres or star-lifting.

Although, if you look at it that way, it would still take thousands of years before the skies appeared "empty," since we're getting light from thousands of years ago. I'm not sure if a centaur would use "soon" in this sense, so perhaps Eliezer has something different in mind.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 13 December 2013 12:53:29AM *  5 points [-]

time turners exist
harry wants to become god
people have died in the past

Comment author: TobyBartels 13 December 2013 05:05:58AM 6 points [-]

You should edit that so that the last line has only five syllables.

Comment author: ygert 13 December 2013 09:49:49AM *  4 points [-]

time turners exist

Harry wants to become god

not all still live, yet

Perhaps?

Or:

time turners exist

Harry wants to become god

There are some still dead

Comment author: VAuroch 14 December 2013 01:03:29AM 1 point [-]

time turners exist

harry wants to become god

some already died

Comment author: Alsadius 13 December 2013 10:32:42PM 1 point [-]

"people have died before" "people have died in past"

Comment author: ygert 14 December 2013 03:33:54PM 1 point [-]

In the past. You lose elegance points if you have to drop words in order to fit what you want to say in the requisate number of syllables.

Comment author: Alsadius 14 December 2013 06:05:52PM 0 points [-]

"in past" is a perfectly valid form. How I talk, really.

Comment author: TobyBartels 15 December 2013 06:10:50AM 0 points [-]

I've heard "in future" before (my mind tags it as British), so "in past" makes sense. But you still have 6 syllables (unless "people have" is only 2, as "peep-lav"?). I came up with "Folks have died before." myself.

Comment author: Alsadius 16 December 2013 06:44:24AM 0 points [-]

I'm bad at syllables. Any time I try haikuing, I almost invariably think one word quickly, ignore the excess syllables I'm not pronouncing, and mess it up.

Comment author: ygert 15 December 2013 11:40:07AM *  1 point [-]

Inspired by this, I wrote some more of these, summarizing the first five chapters of HPMOR.

Comment author: knb 14 December 2013 04:24:06AM 0 points [-]

What is your point?

Comment author: RomeoStevens 14 December 2013 10:01:49PM *  0 points [-]

If Harry unlocks magical godhood the transformation might be instantaneous from this timeline's persective.