You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on Local truth - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: NancyLebovitz 20 December 2013 05:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (76)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 21 December 2013 03:51:58AM *  1 point [-]

We are pretty far off the original question, but, yeah, there is a distinction. The fine structure constant is indeed more fundamental than the speed of light. How do you change the speed of light and not much else? You have to change at least the fine structure constant (in the IR limit, as you point out) and probably the gravitational coupling strength, and possibly some other free parameters in the standard model, like masses of the electron and quarks (again, in some dimensionless units). Otherwise something will go wrong with the Universe, the common example being carbon not being synthesized by stars. But I agree, these "side effects" of changing the speed of light may not have been important long time ago, or maybe in the galaxy far far away.

Comment author: RolfAndreassen 21 December 2013 05:45:48AM 1 point [-]

But this is just as true if you change alpha! At a minimum, to restore the carbon synthesis rate, you'd have to mess with the proton charge.