You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Open thread for December 24-31, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: NancyLebovitz 24 December 2013 08:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (207)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 December 2013 08:41:39PM 7 points [-]

Plants and intelligence-- plants do a lot more problem-solving than you might think.

Comment author: CellBioGuy 27 December 2013 03:55:09AM *  6 points [-]

My labmate is doing research on the interaction between the plant circadian rhythm and the plant immune system. Their various immune hormones (along with all kinds of other things) are modulated by a rhythm that anticipates the diurnally-varying likelihood of fungal infection and can be phase-shifted not just by light but by humidity. The hormones that modulate this are systemic and get carried throughout the plant and can easily be taken up through roots.

After poking his plants in the lab he came up with the idea of getting our tomato plants we were growing together this summer to sacrifice a little bit of biomass in favor of fungus resistance by watering them with dilute aspirin (a slightly modified version of a plant immune system hormone originally extracted from willow bark) in the early mornings, and we discovered that other people had been doing this successfully for decades without any particular known mechanism. That chemical is easy enough for them to make and some plants (like willows) are absolutely full of it. Would not be surprised if they secreted it into the soil and if it bled over into adjacent plants. They also do not limit their interactions to other plants - I have seen research to the effect that most plants actively secrete sugars into the soil around their roots to attract bacteria which break down minerals and nutrients into forms they can absorb, and that they actively allow many symbiotic fungi into their roots without mounting immune responses.

Comment author: jaibot 26 December 2013 09:14:55AM 4 points [-]

Harry froze in sudden realization just as the forkful of carrots was about to enter his mouth.

That couldn't, couldn't possibly be true, surely no wizard would be stupid enough to do THAT...

And Harry knew, with a dreadful sinking feeling, that of course they would be that stupid. Salazar Slytherin had probably never considered the moral implications of snake intelligence for even one second, just like it hadn't ever occurred to Salazar that Muggleborns were intelligent enough to deserve personhood rights. Most people just didn't see moral issues at all unless someone else was pointing them out...

"Harry?" said Terry from beside him, sounding like he was afraid he would regret asking. "Why are you staring at your fork like that?"

"I'm starting to think magic should be illegal," said Harry. "By the way, have you ever heard any stories about wizards who could speak with plants?"

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 26 December 2013 11:42:17AM 3 points [-]

How much reliable is the International Journal of Parapsychology?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 26 December 2013 04:35:18PM -1 points [-]

Why did you bring that up?

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 26 December 2013 04:51:15PM *  4 points [-]

It was in the article you linked.

EDIT: Okay, now I see other sources were mentioned later. But that was the point when I stopped reading. Sorry, it's a heuristic that works pretty well outside of LW.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 26 December 2013 09:11:18PM 0 points [-]

And perhaps outside The New Yorker?

Comment author: aelephant 26 December 2013 02:52:37AM 1 point [-]

And yet those horrible vegetarians continue to murder & eat these sentient lifeforms!

Comment author: B_For_Bandana 26 December 2013 04:39:36PM 14 points [-]

Because each step in the food chain involves energy loss, the shorter the chain, the fewer plants need to be killed to support you. Thus being a vegetarian saves plant lives too.

Comment author: aelephant 29 December 2013 02:14:06AM 1 point [-]

Actually grazing cattle don't kill plants, they just trim off the ends.

Comment author: kalium 29 December 2013 04:31:58AM -1 points [-]

Depends on plant species (not all survive trimming well) and cattle density (trampling certainly kills plants). However, most meat and dairy are not sustained purely by grazing. That said, harvesting grain to feed to cattle doesn't have to kill plants either, unless we consider the embryo in a seed to have the same moral status as a mature plant.

In practice, growing grain to feed to cattle to feed to humans will involve killing a lot more weeds than growing grain to feed straight to humans.

Comment author: aelephant 29 December 2013 10:32:02AM 1 point [-]

Feeding grain to cattle is an awful practice that needs to stop; the sooner, the better.

Re: grazing cattle, have you seen Allan Savory's TED talk? http://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_green_the_world_s_deserts_and_reverse_climate_change.html

Comment author: ChristianKl 27 December 2013 02:36:36PM 1 point [-]

The discussion seems to be interesting, maybe we can use the same criteria to decide whether plants are intelligent that are used to decide whether computers are intelligent?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 27 December 2013 04:10:08PM 1 point [-]

What criteria do we use to decide that we're intelligent?

Comment author: ChristianKl 29 December 2013 05:50:47PM *  0 points [-]

If plants are intelligent without neurons that raises the likelihood that there something to human intelligence that also beyond neurons. As a result head cryonics is less likely to offer full recovery of human minds.

Comment author: Locaha 29 December 2013 06:15:29PM -1 points [-]

My smartphone is intelligent without neurons.

Comment author: ChristianKl 29 December 2013 06:20:43PM 0 points [-]

It relatively easy to understand how the smart phone makes the decisions. There a central processor. Plants on the other hand have no central processor.