You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JGWeissman comments on Donating to MIRI vs. FHI vs. CEA vs. CFAR - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: ChrisHallquist 27 December 2013 03:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JGWeissman 27 December 2013 06:08:14AM 22 points [-]

I'm convinced AGI is much more likely to be built by a government or major corporation, which makes me more inclined to think movement-building activities are likely to be valuable, to increase the odds of the people at that government or corporation being conscious of AI safety issues, which MIRI isn't doing.

MIRI's AI workshops get outside mathematicians and AI researchers involved in FAI research, which is good for movement building within the population of people likely to be involved in creating an AGI.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 January 2014 02:38:06AM 2 points [-]

MIRI hasn't been very successful in brining in outside AI researchers. What basis is there for thinking that mathmaticians will have significant impact on the creation of AGI?