You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Clarity comments on Soft Paternalism in Parenting - Less Wrong Discussion

32 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 04 January 2014 03:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Clarity 19 September 2015 08:43:02AM 1 point [-]

Resilience to violence in children :

Personal characteristics of the child (i.e. sense of self, mastery of tasks, sense of humor, security). Amazingly, there are children who seem to have a strong sense of self and are able to weather an enormous amount of violence in their lives by drawing on internal reserves and resources. These children seem to understand that the violence isn’t their fault, feel successful in various areas of their life (school, sports, friendships), and may have strong sense of racial or ethnic pride. High intelligence has also been associated with positive adaptation in the face of adversity.

Presence or absence of loving and supportive adults in their lives. The single most critical factor in how children weather exposure to domestic violence is the presence of at least one loving and supportive adult in their life.

I reckon it's appropriate if the kid is inherently resilient or if someone else is a loving and supporting adult in their life. Otherwise I wouldn't risk it. There's a fine line between soft paternalism and domestic violence.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 19 September 2015 10:44:22AM *  0 points [-]

The single most critical factor in how children weather exposure to domestic violence is the presence of at least one loving and supportive adult in their life.

But could you explain where the connection to domestic violence is in this post?