Street harassment takes some of the fun out of life.

Getting rape and murder threats on line really does distress and distract people, and it seems to be much more likely to happen to women.

What's left for feminists to fight for are pretty much non-issues in comparison

Actually, there is a lot left for feminists to fight... but most of that is in other countries. Female genital mutilation being the most obvious example.

Two problems with that.

First, all humans are naturally selfish. My own hurt thumb feels like a greater tragedy than someone else being killed. In the same way, a sexist comment somewhere on internet feels like a greater issue than someone being mutilated on the other side of the planet, if the former is about me and the latter isn't. It's the same reason why Occupy is more popular than Effective Altruism; both are about people who have more giving to people who have less, but only in the former you are included in the list of possible recipients.

Second, there are political alliances, because the more applause lights you put together, the more applause you get. Unfortunately, at some moments some of the applause lights get in conflict. How can you believe "female genital mutilation is evil" and "all cultures are completely equal" or even "all native cultures are noble and perfect" at the same time? Let's rather focus on the non-issues which avoid these paradoxes; you can always safely speak about the evil of the white hetero cis males.

Maybe we need another movement that will care about eradicating female genital mutilation in the world. Even if doing so requires saying politically incorrect things.

Oh, okay, I think I understand your original comment better now. I thought you were criticizing the constant move towards "new" X-isms to fight against. (i.e., moving from race to LGBT). I think it's possible that feminist groups wield power disproportionate to the egregiousness of what they are now combating, serious though implicit sexism can be.

Recurse a few levels, and what you're really saying is "After the Renaissance, Europeans took over the world and its resources, and the resource distribution has been slow to change since".

Remind me again, why do Han Chinese have higher IQ than Europeans?

There is an unfortunate American tendency to treat all issues of race in the purely white-and-black context.

The world is much more diverse than that. Most people are brown.

Being able to say that certain races are statistically more violent and less intelligent than others has historically been correlated with lynch mobs and skewed priorities when making arrests.

But that's qualitatively different from the way a lot of people who are religious are wrong. Religious people are often wrong on many factual questions.

On Lesswrong I would see no case where religious views should get forbidden because they are dangerous and religious people do awful things.