Small but noisy. They add their special flavour to the tone though, as one of the few places outside their circle of blogs that gives them airtime (much like the neoreactionaries they cross over with).

Rather we support our beliefs with rational arguments, the HBD-deniers don't bother presenting counter arguments (and when they do they tend to be laughably bad) but instead try to argue that it's somehow immoral to say and/or believe these things regardless of their truth value.

I wonder if the people in the subthread below going "we may be racists, but let's be the right sort of racists" understand that this doesn't actually help much.

This could do with some clarification - doesn't help whom with what? And, by contrast, what would help?