You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on [LINK] Why I'm not on the Rationalist Masterlist - Less Wrong Discussion

21 Post author: Apprentice 06 January 2014 12:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (866)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 January 2014 01:21:26AM 3 points [-]

That a bad example given that the user in question wasn't anonymous.

Being truly anonymous on the 'net is harder than most people imagine.

In Western society using Tor and not leaking personal information should be sufficient for protecting that kind of speech.

I am not sure this is the case. Example.

Oh, and in this context what's special about a Western society?

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 January 2014 01:56:12AM 2 points [-]

I am not sure this is the case. Example.

Not an example of speech that happens within a forum.

Oh, and in this context what's special about a Western society?

We have a concepts such as guilty until proven innocent with makes it hard to sentence people based on statistical stylometry data.

The interest in censorship is also lower. It's much easier to simply ignore speech because Western society is more resilient.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 January 2014 02:07:18AM 4 points [-]

Not an example of speech that happens within a forum.

It's an example of someone "using Tor and not leaking personal information".

Comment author: CronoDAS 08 January 2014 04:35:00AM 1 point [-]

We have a concepts such as guilty until proven innocent with makes it hard to sentence people based on statistical stylometry data.

"Innocent until proven guilty" you mean?

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 January 2014 12:02:17PM 0 points [-]

Yes ;)