You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam_Bur comments on [LINK] Why I'm not on the Rationalist Masterlist - Less Wrong Discussion

21 Post author: Apprentice 06 January 2014 12:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (866)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 09 January 2014 03:28:49PM *  15 points [-]

Yes, they need to know our buttons and press them. Such as:

  • you are an unfriendly place for women;

  • you say that politics is the mindkiller, but secretly all of you are libertarians (or all of you are conservatives);

  • you are actually a cult;

...and for the best impact: all of the above, in a long article, with citations out of context from random parts of the website; quoting some offensive and heavily downvoted comments and presenting them as a typical LW content; claiming to be an expert on artificial intelligence or quantum physics and claiming that everything LW says on these topics is a pseudoscience. Did I forget something important? Oh yes, the basilisk! And end with a huge generalization that this all proves that LW is a horrible group of people, and that you will tell everyone you know to avoid LW: both your personal friends, and also any scientist or an organizer of an atheist or skeptic meetup.

(I am not saying this is what the linked article did. Just that this is what I would include into a troll manual, and bet money that LW couldn't resist discussing such article. But a subset of this is enough to succeed.)

Comment author: Emile 10 January 2014 10:46:42PM 8 points [-]

You forgot torture vs dust specks, nerd rapture, building a benevolent God, and many-worlds.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 January 2014 11:24:07AM 8 points [-]

...and cryonics.

Comment author: satt 11 January 2014 12:31:52PM 0 points [-]

...and for the best impact: all of the above, in a long article, with citations out of context from random parts of the website;

Eh, it's been done.

(As it happens, that article's been linked before in Discussion without triggering a big argument. But the Discussion post was deleted, and the post only mentioned that "Cult of Bayes' Theorem" article in a parenthetical aside, so it's not a very good natural experiment.)