You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Kawoomba comments on Some thoughts on having children - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: pianoforte611 08 January 2014 05:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (106)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kawoomba 14 January 2014 05:38:43PM 0 points [-]

If you include spouses under "friends"

I most certainly don't. Relative usually refers to "someone connected by blood, marriage, or adoption".

Comment author: Pfft 14 January 2014 06:20:30PM 0 points [-]

But then what is the relevance to the question of whether to have children or not? The rest of your comment seems to implicitly assume that the only way to get more relatives is to have children.

Comment author: Kawoomba 15 January 2014 10:25:41AM 0 points [-]

My comment focused on children because that's the topic at hand; building a strong long-time bond with a significant other (or others, if you're so inclined) can be another avenue (often less reliable) of attaining a dependable support group. The comment wasn't meant to be exhaustive.

Personally I'd never put a spouse in the same category as "friends" in this context, but of course you may categorize whichever way you like. (For example, I'd agree that if you count children as friends, then friends would always be preferable, since (friends including children) is strictly more support than (just children). Such trivial labelling tennis wouldn't change the underlying dynamics, of course.)