You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

lmm comments on Recreational Cryonics - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: topynate 15 January 2014 08:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: lmm 16 January 2014 01:39:44AM 2 points [-]

Why play with humans? For an AI I would expect forks of itself to be vastly more engaging. If such an AI did want to play with much lesser minds, there's no reason for it to be particularly interested in the human region of mindspace (and creating minds from nothing will be trivial enough that I would expect it to be easier than all the messy matter-manipulation required for cryonic revival), so I don't see why it would bother simulating a particular human unless and until it got around to simulating all beings of complexity <n (and reaching an n high enough for humans seems implausible even for an AI)