You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

sixes_and_sevens comments on Open Thread for January 17 - 23 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: niceguyanon 17 January 2014 01:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (191)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 21 January 2014 12:41:46PM 1 point [-]

There were a few contributing factors to me stopping, but probably the biggest was a combination of frustration and ineffectiveness. In any given session I would end up with a small handful of cards that for whatever reason just wouldn't go in. It'd present one to me, I'd 'fess up that I didn't get it right, and then it would wait just long enough for me to forget it before presenting it again.

There didn't seem to be any "honest" procedure for going "look, dude, I'm clearly not going to get these ones today, so stop showing them to me."

Comment author: Emile 22 January 2014 09:01:56AM 2 points [-]

How about just suspending/deleting them? Or setting a half-hour aside to just rewrite those cards to make them much easier? (shorter answers, cues in the question, cloze deletion, break them into several cards...)

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 22 January 2014 10:00:40AM 1 point [-]

They tended to be cards whose answers were either date ranges in periods of history I'm not familiar with, or in languages I don't have significant exposure to. Essentially material I didn't have any kind of infrastructure to pin the facts on.

Generally, though, if I'd go and read up on the area to develop that infrastructure, I wouldn't need Anki.