You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ThisSpaceAvailable comments on The Onrushing Wave - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: Douglas_Reay 18 January 2014 01:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 19 January 2014 10:28:44PM 0 points [-]

The benefits of parallelization are highly depended on the task, but there are quite a lot of tasks that are very amenable to it. It's difficult to rewrite a system from the ground up to take advantage of parallelization, but systems are designed with it in mind from the beginning, they can simply be scaled up as a larger number of processors becomes economically feasible. For quite a few algorithms, setting up parallelization is quite easy. Creating a new bitcoin block, for instance, is already a highly parallel task. As far as society-changing applications, there's a wide variety of tasks that are very susceptible to parallelization. Certainly, human-level intelligence does not appear to require huge serial power; human neurons have a firing rate in at most a few hundred hertz. Self-driving cars, wearable computers, drones, database integration ... I don't see a need for super-fast processors for any of these.