You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

adamzerner comments on Why don't more rationalists start startups? - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: adamzerner 20 January 2014 07:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: adamzerner 21 January 2014 03:24:04AM 0 points [-]

I agree about people's reluctance to pay for things on the internet. For that reason, I think I'd make money via advertisements. Judging by the size of my competitors (College Prowler, Unigo, Cappex, Princeton Review...), that seems like a sufficient way to make a lot of money.

Regarding the 'z', I don't like it either, but the guy who owns the 'collegeanswers.com' domain wanted $10k for it because it was "in development" (which is bs because since the summer when he told me, it hasn't become a site). I don't even have that much money. I've thought about a bunch of other names, but decided on 'collegeanswerz.com'.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 21 January 2014 05:23:29PM 0 points [-]

I'm under the impression that ad revenue isn't really considered a solid revenue strategy anymore. Am I mistaken or is there a reason it's particularly viable in your case?

Comment author: adamzerner 21 January 2014 05:27:37PM *  0 points [-]

I'm not too sure. My logic is: my 4 competitors are multimillion dollar companies. I think I could be (much) better than them. Thus, I think I could be a multimillion dollar company.

But I should look into the viability of depending on ad revenue. I've tried googling around, but haven't had too much success. I think I'll try some more though, and also try to talk to the right people about it.

Comment author: jkaufman 22 January 2014 01:19:11PM 0 points [-]

How much have you looked into how your competitors make money? My impression is that the Princeton Review mostly makes money by selling physical books.

Comment author: adamzerner 22 January 2014 03:08:39PM 0 points [-]

I know Princeton Review makes money with guidebooks. And I get the impression that College Prowler and Unigo mix that with advertising, based on the articles I've read. Even so, I could get into that game too, and be better at it because my reviews are so much more comprehensive. I thought of the idea last night to make a big table comparing the information that my site provides with the information that Princeton Review, College Prowler, Unigo, Cappex, and College Board provide.