You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emily comments on Why don't more rationalists start startups? - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: adamzerner 20 January 2014 07:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emily 21 January 2014 06:14:51PM 3 points [-]

I've considered it, but I figure that the value of having it outweighs this. I don't see it as something that is strong enough to draw too many people away from the site. Maybe it'd be a good idea to remove it from the front page though to be safe. What do you think?

Removing it from the front page could certainly get you a few visitors who stay longer than to read that, react with "huh, guess this is not a classy site" or whatever, and leave.

For the record, I don't think it should be insulting that people care about appearance. I wish I didn't care about it, but I do (it isn't fair because it's not something you can control. however, pretending that you don't care is poor instrumental rationality). I get the sense that it's human nature, and you can't really help it. That's not to say that you think someone has some sort of lower "worth" if they aren't as attractive. It's just to say that more attractive people => better chances of finding a girl/boyfriend, and more fun hooking up. It has nothing to do with respect or social/intellectual interaction, just romantic/lustful.

Of course it's simply true that people are interested in the physical attractiveness of other people. Declaring that fact insulting is a nonsensical thing to do. It's the choice (not on this one isolated occasion, of course, but in the context of millions and millions of other such choices constantly made in the media etc) of the "hot" and "girls" framing of your understanding of this point that rankles, and may well rankle with others. Of course it's the women who are evaluated for their hotness, not the men. Of course hotness is chosen to evaluate them. Of course they're referred to using the term "girls". Because it's that way all the time. You'll tell me that it has to be like this, because that's how college-aged men speak and think. Pity you'll gain some people who speak and think like that and lose some who don't, in my opinion.