You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Decision Auctions aka "How to fairly assign chores, or decide who gets the last cookie" - Less Wrong Discussion

35 [deleted] 21 January 2014 09:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: KnaveOfAllTrades 21 January 2014 10:24:23PM *  8 points [-]

I always enjoy your contributions and it makes me sad that you use the site less than you would because of a/the downvote stalker.* I'm interested in applying microeconomics to these sorts of domestic or between-friends situations in which it might conventionally be taboo to do so, and this type of bidding in particular is something I've wondered about, so thanks for posting this!

*(I am not sure how easy it would be for an admin to look at the database and figure out what to do once someone's been identified as a downvote stalker, but I'm skeptical it would not be worthwhile at least trying to sort it out given how destructive it is, and at the very least I'd like to know why it seems nothing's been done. (Not to assign blame, but to try to figure out how we can get faster response on such issues in future.) If there really is one or a small number of people behind most of the downvote stalking, then checking the downvotes against victims should take (<)<15 minutes. I'd put >80% probability on this turning up one or more stalkers even just doing a naive database query using the set of victims in this thread.)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 22 January 2014 06:51:27PM 22 points [-]

The first person who ran some detection programs on the whole database didn't discover useful hits. I recently wrote them again and asked them to check daenerys as target specifically.

Comment author: KnaveOfAllTrades 23 January 2014 04:04:53PM *  4 points [-]

Thank you for clarifying what had already been attempted (and that something had been), and making further attempts!