You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MrMind comments on An additional problem with Solomonoff induction - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: gedymin 22 January 2014 11:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 23 January 2014 02:13:00AM *  1 point [-]

This is QM interpretation-dependent, of course, but any deterministic, non-random interpretation of quantum mechanics involves things like faster-than light interaction etc., which frankly are much less intuitive.

In a truly deterministic universe, the concept of "faster-than light interaction" is largely nonsensical. It requires a space-like separation between cause and effect ... but in a fully deterministic universe, effects are fully determined by the boundary conditions; no event within the universe is the ultimate cause of any other event.

Comment author: MrMind 24 January 2014 09:57:00AM *  2 points [-]

In a fully deterministic universe, every time-slice can be considered equivalent to a boundary condition, and the concept of a speed limit of propagation still makes sense. In the instant after the considered slice, a point is affected only by its immediate neighbours. But as we keep going further in time, to calculate the state of a point we will need to account for larger and larger neighbourhoods of the same point in the first slice.
This is exactly what happens e.g. in general relativity, which fully deterministic (away from singularities) yet speed-limited.