You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ThisSpaceAvailable comments on I love zebras - Less Wrong Discussion

8 [deleted] 05 February 2014 05:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 08 February 2014 02:41:17AM 1 point [-]

"Here, treating the expected population of zebras as literally P(zebra)=0"

That phrase lacks a finite verb.

I don't see that inferential statistical methods break down. On the contrary, they give exactly the correct answer that one would expect. The variance under the null is zero, so the z value is infinity, so the p value is zero. Whether you do a z-test, a t-test, or a Poisson test, you're going to get p = 0, and therefore reject the null. Your trying to link this to the claim that 0 is not a probability is begging the question.