You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Squark comments on Open Thread for February 11 - 17 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Coscott 11 February 2014 06:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (325)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Squark 16 February 2014 08:26:51PM 0 points [-]

By utilitiarian you mean:

  1. Caring about all people equally

  2. Hedonism, i.e. caring about pleasure/pain

  3. Both of the above (=Bentham's classical utilitarianism)?

In any case, what answer do you expect? What would constitute a valid reason? What are the assumptions from which you want to derive this?

Comment author: [deleted] 17 February 2014 05:19:59PM *  0 points [-]

Both of the above (=Bentham's classical utilitarianism)

I mean this.

In any case, what answer do you expect?

I do not expect any specific answer.

What would constitute a valid reason?

For me personally, probably nothing, since, apparently, I neither really care about people (I guess I overintellectuallized my empathy), nor about pleasure and suffering. The question, however, was asked mostly to better understand other people.

What are the assumptions from which you want to derive this?

I don't know any.