You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RichardKennaway comments on A defense of Senexism (Deathism) - Less Wrong Discussion

-5 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 16 February 2014 07:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (88)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 17 February 2014 02:32:11PM 2 points [-]

Group selection benefits of aging

What do you mean by aging?

  1. The passage of time without dying.

  2. Accumulating decreptitude.

  3. Accumulating experience, knowledge, expertise, wisdom.

These are different things that are only contingently related to each other, but conflating them lets you make arguments that fall apart once one notices the equivocation on "aging". "Aging(3) is good, but aging(2) ends in death, therefore death is good."

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 17 February 2014 03:52:22PM 0 points [-]

Interesting point. In the context of this post it is 2 (though you shouldn't have chosen a derogative).

I don't think someone would name 1 when asked about the biological (or colloquial) meaning of aging. And 3 would seldom be cited alone but probably more often as compensation aspect of 2.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 17 February 2014 04:40:32PM 0 points [-]

In the context of this post it is 2 (though you shouldn't have chosen a derogative).

"Decreptitude" is descriptive, not derogative. Decrepit: wasted and weakened by or as if by the infirmities of old age (Merriam-Webster Online).

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 17 February 2014 08:45:43PM 0 points [-]

That's decrepitude. Your use with "t" implied a derogative with "creep". But it seems to have been a typo. Sorry for misinterpreting this.