You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ThisSpaceAvailable comments on Meta: social influence bias and the karma system - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: Snorri 17 February 2014 01:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 18 February 2014 06:20:16AM 9 points [-]

But the point of voting is for you to be a provider of information, not to be a consumer of information. If your vote is simply reflecting the information content already available from the other votes, what have you added? Put in LW terms, your vote should entangled with information unique to you. If the only information it is entangled with is other votes, then you're just perpetuating an information cascade. This isn't Hollywood Squares. The point of voting isn't to "win". It's not to pat yourself on the back for upvoting useful posts. It's to provide people with useful information about whether the post is useful. When you're deciding whether to upvote, you shouldn't be asking "Do I think this post is useful?", but "Is this post, given the current vote total more likely to be useful than other posts with the same post total?"