My eye doctor diagnosed closed-angle glaucoma, and recommends an iridectomy. I think he might be a bit too trigger-happy, so I followed up with another doctor, and she didn't find the glaucoma. She carefully stated that the first diagnosis can still be the correct one, the first was a more complete examination.
Any insights about the pros and cons of iridectomy?
Is there a family history of this? If so that would skew my assessment towards that of the first doctor. If not, seriously another opinion...
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.