You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Proportional Giving - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: gjm 02 March 2014 09:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (86)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 03 March 2014 08:01:27AM *  1 point [-]

Given that there are competing incentives (altruism vs. egoism and others) it is clear that some trade-off is needed. An optimum solution might be too complex to be understood and accepted as fair by everyone. Thus we have to look for simple approximations.

The simplest are

1 give nothing: g(x)=0

2 give a fixed amount: g(x)=c

3 give a fixed fraction: g(x)=fx

4 give everything above a treshold: g(x)=x>c?x-c:0

5 give a fixed fraction above a treshold: g(x)=x>c?f(x-c):0

6 give a by second order polynomial: g(x)=ax^2+bx+c

7 give a by second order polynomial with treshold: g(x)=x>c?ax^2+bx+d:0

Actually 4) is more complicated than

  • give/receive above a treshold: g(x)=x-c

which implies that I should take if I have less than the treshold.

What other simple functions are there and what do they imply?