= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
SoerenMind comments on A vote against spaced repetition - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (66)
While recommending the article I wouldn't recommend the deck because of cards like:
Front: redundancy can be performed by repeating information using...
Back: various methods
To me that card looks likes trouble.
True. In the deck they make a point about that it's okay to have really simple cards since those will take a very small share of your time. But some are just useless. I keep a finger on the delete-button while doing my flash cards.
The problem with the card is not that it's simple.
The problem is that even if I know that there method A, method B and method C for redundancy, my automatic answer to the question isn't various methods.
I might think of method A, sometimes I might think of method C. Because there's no clear answer the card doesn't lend itself to SRS. If I haven't seen the card in a year I won't think that the answer to it is "various methods" but I will think of more specific methods.